Archive for the 'Hints' Category

The Expected Value

Saturday, June 10th, 2006

I’ve noticed that in my previous posts I’ve used some terms that are really important to know.
First of all it’s expected value.
The term comes from the probability theory.
You are in a restaurant looking at a menu. You see two entrees that you like equally, but one is cheaper than the other. You decide to order the cheaper one because you will be just as happy with it. You have just made a decision based on the comparison of the expected value of the two entrees.
You are driving on a highway during rush hour. Your lane seems to be going slower than the lane to your left. The first chance you get, you switch over to the left lane so you can get home faster. You have just made a decision based on the comparison of the expected value of the two lanes.
You are playing poker. The pot is very big, but your hand is mediocre. On the last round of betting, you say “ah, what the heck, I’m going to call, the pot is just too big.” You have just made a decision based on the perceived expected value using information about the size of the pot and the strength of your hand.
Expected value is a concept that everybody uses in their daily lives, although they may not realize it. Whenever we have a choice, we use expected value to guide us on our decision. Sometimes the value of the choices are not purely monetary as it could be based on happiness, a term that academics like to call utility. Usually there is no need to use a formula to calculate the expected value of a decision, but there are some cases where the use of calculating expected value will show us something that is counterintuitive or simply show us why a certain idea is correct or incorrect. It can also help us to pinpoint what factors we need to consider when we are playing poker.
Expected value (EV) is a term used to describe the value of an event over the course of all possibilities. It is an easy way to describe situations that can have many different results, and shows the average result over all the probabilities. A simple example involves a basketball player at the free throw line. If the basketball player has made 750 free throws out of 1000 free throw attempts, you could estimate that he has a 75% chance of making a free throw attempt. Then you can say the EV of the number of points that he will score on one free throw attempt is 0.75. He will either make the free throw and score one point or miss the free throw and not score a point, but on average, he is expected to score 0.75 points with one free throw. The concept of EV is used throughout this book to demonstrate the values of certain poker plays and ideas. This section shows how EV can be calculated and demonstrates how it can be used, in preparation for its usage throughout this book.
The way to calculate the EV of an event is to take all possible events and assign a probability and a result to them. The sum of the probabilities will equal 100%, and the sum of each individual result multiplied by its probability will equal the EV. If the EV of the event is a positive number, we can say the event has a positive expectation or positive value. If the EV of the even is a negative number, we can say the event has a negative expectation or negative value.
Here’s an example in Hold’em
You are playing $10-$20 Hold’em and the pot is currently $80 after the Turn card.. You have an open-ended straight draw and you are 100% sure your opponent has a hand that you will not beat unless you make a straight. But if you do hit your straight, you will win the hand. You believe there is a 17% chance that you will make your straight and a 83% chance that you will not. (In the chapters on Outs and Pot Odds, I will go into further detail on how to estimate your chances of winning and losing.)
Your opponent bets $20 and you must decide to call or fold. You only have $20 left in your stack, and if you call, you cannot lose more or win more on the River as you are considered all-in. If you call and win, you will win $100. If you call and lose, you will lose $20. You have to figure out if calling has a positive expectation.

Action
Computation
Result
EV of 10/20 problem
(17% x $100) + (83% x -20)
+$0.40

So you expect to make $0.40 by calling, which means it is better to call than fold. Sometimes you will win $100, more often you will lose $20. However on average, you expect to make $0.40. Calculations like this are difficult for most players to do in their heads while at the poker table. In the chapter on Pot Odds, a simpler way to make the determination of calling or folding is shown. It is practical and much easier to implement, and yet it will be consistent with the EV equations. It is still useful to understand and apply the EV equations when studying the game and thinking about certain situations when not at the poker table. That is its purpose in this book, using it to study the game as opposed to using the equations directly at the table. There are simpler ways to make those calculations and not give up any accuracy.
In poker, whether they know it or not, players are always trying to put themselves into situations where they have positive EV. Good players are able to distinguish between situations that have positive EV and negative EV. When they have positive EV, they will decide to get involved in the hand. When they do not have positive EV, they will get out of the hand. Meanwhile, bad players are not able to distinguish between positive and negative EV. Thus they will often get involved in hands that have negative EV. Sometimes they will get out of hands that have positive EV. Every poker player must identify the difference between positive EV situations and negative EV situations. Once the positive EV situations are identified, the goal is identify the best play that will maximize the EV.

How to play a hand with AK or AKs?

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

Every poker player has faced this situation. Every poker session you deal with it. No matter where are you playing in Vegas, Miami or California you will see this case. And every book that deals with poker explains it. But I’m still not sure. I’m talking about a hand like AK or AQ or even AKs. Of course it’s not a problem when it goes the way you like. You raise preflop, then get some calls and face one or two top pairs on flop. I like these situations most. I prefer to slowplay a little checking or calling the flop and then “banzai!!!” on turn and river. And especially I like guys who call and raise my stakes having the same pair with lower kicker. That is really very profitable. 

But the question is what shall I do if I have raised preflop and have absolutely nothing on the flop? Like I have AKo and flop is J73 rainbow… The first idea is to fold immediately. My wife prefers to play that way. She says playing low limits you could be absolutely sure that some of they guys that called your preflop had improved their hands with that flop. So in this case you have to struggle with one or even two lower pairs having nothing but implied odds. You still HOPE to get your pair (having 8 / 46 + 8 / 45 = 0.35 chances to get a pair) while they HAVE their pair already and chances to beat you. 

The other point of view is suggested by many authors. They consider the odds to be rather high related to the pot you could win in that case. So the right move in this situation is to bet or raise someone’s bet on flop. Those who prefer to bet in this situation use this line of reasoning. Let’s consider usual situation. You have AK in middle position. There are several folds before you. You raise and all the others fold except one guy. This case is the most typical. Then we have 2 to 1 chances that your opponent haven’t improved his flop too. That’s why you have very good chances to win a pot just after your bet. Considering that we bet 1 stake that forms a pot of 5 stakes the expected value of this bet is positive. Even if he calls you still have good chances to improve your hand. And bu the way you have a chance to win with ace high at showdown. And there is one more argument to perform bet here. You could do this with an overpair. If you check a flop with AK no one will call you bet when you have an overpair. So you will earn less in both cases that steals your earnings. 

Of course both this arguments are concerning the flop only. You have to think over the turn and the river weighing your opponents and the way they play their hands in order to decide whether it is worthy to bet on turn. 

My opinion is closer to the second position. In most case I prefer to bet this deck. But at the same time any check-raise can easily brake me down even my opponents has 27o and no pair too. Could anyone explain me what is the right way to play these hands. Please consider my limits. I still play $0.25 - $0.5 though I’m tired a little of this limit. Maybe at $0.5 - $1 this situation will be much easier to deal with. 

P.S. By the way when I have seen European Poker Tour or World Series of Poker on TV I mostly see the guys playing all in with AK. They are playing no limit holdem of course. But they are top poker professionals. I think they know what they are doing. That is one more argument to bet here. Anyway I’m willing to see you comments to discuss the topic. 

The right decisions

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

“Decisions, not results. Do the right thing enough times and the results will take care of themselves in the long run”
/ Thomas Austin “Amarillo Slim” Preston, Jr./

First I want to introduce a guy that stated the thing above. Amarillo Slim Preston is a professional gambler. His main poker achievement is the victory on the main event at the World Series of Poker in 1972. It seems to me the guy knows the topic. He proved that. And if the guy earns enough money for his family playing poker I can conclude that he can do that well.
I’m inclined to believe him at least.

And you know the meaning of this statement is that a poker player has to do right things and in the long run he will benefit from it. It doesn’t matter that he had lost a lot of money in that hand. What really matters is the way he had lost the money and the experience he had got in that hand.
As I’ve already written in my post concerning the fundamental theorem of poker if the guy makes the right moves just the same as he knew his opponents’ cards he will be in profit for sure.

I have not played for some time as I had a lot of other stuff to do. That was just a couple of hands but they have given a pleasure for a while to me as I could see that I had done the right moves and they had brought benefit.
Look at this hand. It seems to me that I’ve made flawless victory here.
I was #3 with Qd Ac

Preflop.
SB Posted Small Blind $0.05
BB Posted Big Blind $0.10
#1 Folds, #2 Calls $0.10, #3 Raised to $0.20, 6 folds, BB Calls $0.10, #2 Calls $0.10.
3 players 6.5 Bets

Flop 2s Qh Ad
BB Bets $0.10, #2 Calls $0.10, #3 Calls $0.10
3 players 9.5 Bets

Turn 6h
BB Bets $0.20, #2 Raised to $0.40, #3 Raised to $0.60, BB Calls $0.40, #2 All In for $0.20
3 players 13.75 Big Bets

River 8s
BB Checks, #3 Bets $0.20, BB Raised to $0.40, #3 Reraised to $0.60, BB Calls $0.20

#3 Shows - Qd Ac

BB Shows - As 8c

#2 Shows - Ah 6d

be0wolf Wins 19.75 Big Bets from pot with : Two Pair, Aces and Queens

I think even Amarillo Slim Preston couldn’t play this hand better.
Any objections?

The fundamental theorem of poker

Wednesday, May 24th, 2006

First I should admit that I’m not pretending to be the author of this idea. But the experience I have for the moment confirms that it’s true. It could bring you the money if you follow it and rob you if not.
I’m speaking about The Fundamental Theorem of Poker. Every guy who’s going to play poker should understand this concept. If you are playing more often than once a month you’ll feel the difference.
And your family also will feel the difference (^_^)
The statement of The Fundamental Theorem of Poker is very simple to understand. But it’s much more difficult to imply to your everyday poker as it demands much from you.
It says:
“If you could play the hand better knowing the cards of your opponent than you were mistaken and that hand has brought you losses. This is true even if you had won the hand. On the other hand if you couldn’t play better knowing the cards of you opponents than you are earning the money even on the case loosing a hand”.
This seems a little bit difficult to understand but it becomes much clearer in these examples.
Consider you have Ah Jh and your only opponent has 2s 7c.
Preflop
You are on BB and he is on SB. He completes to BB and you are checking.
The flop brings Ac Tc 7h.
He bets and you call.
Turn and 8s.
He bets and you call.
River 3c.
He checks and you check too.
As a result you are winning 4 Big Bets with your higher pair earning 2 Big Bets. But if you know the hand of your opponent you were playing differently.
First of all you’d better raise on preflop as your hand is much better than your opponent’s one. This would probably bring you one more bet or an opportunity to win the money without the risk of loosing 277 deck. Then you’d better raise on flop and turn and bet on river for the same reasons. As a result if your opponent call you to showdown you could win 3 more Big Bets from this hand. Frankly speaking you’ve lost these 3 Big bets in this hand.
Got it?
The other situation. Again you are playing heads up with one guy. And again you have Ah Jh and your only opponent has 2s 7c.
Preflop.
He completes SB to BB and you are raising. He calls.
The flop brings Ac Tc 7h.
He checks, you bet and he calls.
Turn and 8s.
He checks, you bet and he calls.
River 7s.
He bets and you fold!
 

On the first glance seems that you’ve lost a lot of your money in vain. But let’s consider your play if you know the cards of your opponent.
Preflop. You have much better cards that will bring you money against your opponent’s hand in most cases. So in most cases you will win the money he put to the pot.
Flop. You have an overpair. You have a pair of aces. It’s like the situation that you have pocket aces that didn’t match the deck. What do you usually do with pocket aces? You bet for sure! And you know that the only cards that could help your opponent are sevens and twos. So there are only 5 cards that could help your opponent and 42 that brings the money to you… Is it enough advantage to bet? I think yes. So again your bet is the best decision you could do.
Turn.
Nothing have changed. Again you have a huge advantage that drives you to bet. Your probability to win had even grew as there is only one opportunity left to change the situation (if you know basics of probability theory you could calculate the proofs for that statement).
River.
Oops! Seems he got the card that improved him over us. In real poker you don’t fold usually in such situations as there could be bluffing. But if we know the cards of your opponent you should fold for sure.
So as a result you have lost this hand. But in more than 80% of such hands you will win. You haven’t given you opponent any additional opportunity to increase his gains. And the next time you’ll win more.
You should clap the guy on the back and cheer him as WSOP winner. He will pay you in the next several minutes.
 

So it’s very important for a poker player to read the hands of his opponents and to behave himself accordingly.